In a nutshell
- ⏰ The Doomsday Clock 2026 is set to 85 seconds to midnight—the closest ever—signalling how near humanity is to making Earth uninhabitable.
- ⚠️ Scientists cite worsening nuclear risk (including the looming expiry of the last US–Russia stockpile treaty on February 4 and conflicts among nuclear-armed states), the escalating climate crisis, rising biological threats (e.g., synthetic mirror life), and AI-driven mis/disinformation.
- 🧠 The clock is a communication tool, not a prediction: despite being an “imperfect metaphor,” it powerfully focuses attention; it’s set by experts and a sponsors’ board that includes Nobel laureates, with roots in the Manhattan Project.
- 📈 Recent trendline: 90 seconds (2023–2024), 89 seconds (2025), now 85 seconds (2026); historically it moved back to 17 minutes to midnight (1991) after major arms control—proof progress can increase safety.
- ✅ Urgent actions: revive/expand arms control, accelerate emissions cuts, strengthen biosafety governance, and regulate AI; individuals can combat disinformation, support independent journalism, and make low-carbon choices—because humans created these risks, we can reduce them.
The Doomsday Clock has ticked to 85 seconds to midnight for 2026, a stark new milestone from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. This symbolic time, unveiled in Washington, DC, is the closest it has ever stood to midnight—the point at which humanity renders Earth uninhabitable. It is not a prediction. It is a warning. A vivid one. Scientists weigh an array of risks—nuclear weapons, the climate crisis, biological threats and AI-fuelled disinformation—to set the hands. The message from the board is blunt: current trajectories are perilous, and action is lagging. Some dismiss the clock as a metaphor, but its resonance is undeniable, sparking urgent debate year after year.
What 85 Seconds to Midnight Really Means
Midnight signals a threshold: the moment when people have made Earth uninhabitable. The Doomsday Clock measures the proximity of global catastrophe through a distilled, public-facing symbol. It is designed to stimulate conversation, not to tally precise probabilities. The Bulletin’s experts, guided by a science and security board and a board of sponsors that includes Nobel laureates, set the time annually after reviewing evidence across multiple domains. The metaphor has limits, as critics note. Dr Michael Mann once called it “an imperfect metaphor,” emphasising that disparate risks unfold on different timescales. Still, he acknowledged its rhetorical power—its capacity to remind us how tenuous our position remains.
The clock’s origins trace back to scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project. Since 1947, it has evolved from nuclear focus to include the climate emergency (added in 2007) and emergent technologies. The clock has never struck midnight—and those who set it hope it never will. Its function is to concentrate public attention, to translate complex, intersecting hazards into a shared reference point. Some years the hands move; some years they do not. In all years, the discussion it triggers matters.
Why the Clock Moved in 2026
The 2026 setting—85 seconds—reflects compounding hazards and shrinking room for error. Alexandra Bell, the Bulletin’s president and CEO, captured the mood: “Humanity has not made sufficient progress on the existential risks that endanger us all… Every second counts and we are running out of time.” The board cited nuclear risk, the worsening climate crisis, biological dangers and the acceleration of disruptive technologies, especially artificial intelligence, as key drivers. The spread of mis- and disinformation, amplified by AI, undermines efforts to address all of the above.
In security terms, 2025 was a bruising year. “Conflicts intensified… with multiple military operations involving nuclear-armed states,” said Dr Daniel Holz, chair of the science and security board. He warned that with the final US–Russia treaty limiting nuclear stockpiles due to lapse on 4 February, “for the first time in over half a century, there will be nothing preventing a runaway nuclear arms race.” On biosafety, new frontiers—such as work on synthetic mirror life—have outpaced global governance. The world remains unprepared for potentially devastating biological threats. Layer on heat records, extreme weather and stalling emissions cuts, and the overall picture darkens. The result: the hands move forward.
A Short Timeline of Recent Settings
The clock has inched closer in recent years, reflecting deteriorating risk across multiple fronts. From 90 seconds in 2023 and 2024 to 89 seconds in 2025, the 2026 decision to set it at 85 seconds marks the starkest reading yet. The Bulletin stresses that it is a communication tool, not a deterministic countdown. That said, history shows movement in both directions. In 1991, following the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, the hands retreated to a record 17 minutes to midnight. Progress can reverse peril. It has before.
| Year | Setting | Principal Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 90 seconds | Nuclear tensions; climate crisis; mis/disinformation |
| 2024 | 90 seconds | Persistent global risks; limited mitigation progress |
| 2025 | 89 seconds | Escalating conflicts; AI acceleration; biosafety concerns |
| 2026 | 85 seconds | Nuclear treaty expiry risks; climate extremes; systemic disinformation |
The clock isn’t a prophecy; it is a prod. Its authority rests on expert deliberation—guidance from a board founded by Albert Einstein with J. Robert Oppenheimer as first chair and now including eight Nobel winners. Some question its utility; others see a vital alarm. Either way, the trendline is clear—and unsettling.
What Can Leaders—and Individuals—Do Now?
There is agency. The Bulletin’s own history insists on it: because humans created these threats, we can reduce them. Leaders can move immediately to stabilise nuclear arsenals with new verification frameworks, extend confidence-building measures, and re-open strategic dialogues. On climate, delivering credible, near-term emissions cuts—power, transport, buildings—remains paramount. Countries must fund adaptation, protect nature-based sinks, and end new unabated fossil development. Biosafety demands global standards for high-risk research and rapid-response surveillance. For AI, governments and firms should enforce transparent model evaluations, watermarking, and clear liability for demonstrable harm.
Citizens count. Speak up. “Without facts, you can’t have truth. Without truth, you can’t have trust,” said journalist Maria Ressa, underscoring the civic duty to resist disinformation. Share verified sources. Support independent media. In daily life, choose low-carbon options—walk when you can, electrify heating where possible, reduce waste, buy seasonal and local. None of this alone moves the hands. Together, underpinned by shared facts and public pressure, it can.
The Doomsday Clock’s 2026 setting is a clear signal that the world’s risk calculus is worsening, but it is also an invitation to act with intent. Treaties can be renewed. Emissions can fall. Research can be governed safely. Time has not run out, but it is running short. The question is whether leaders—and societies—will treat those remaining seconds as precious, not expendable. What step, big or small, are you prepared to take this week to push the hands back?
Did you like it?4.5/5 (22)